🎩 Your personal landing page auditor.
If your landing page isn't converting, Ferguson tells you exactly why. Then writes the corrected copy in your voice, ready to use.
By signing up you'll occasionally receive product news from Ferguson. Unsubscribe any time.
Already have an account? Sign in →
“Genius. Ferguson immediately identified something we would've never thought about. The advice it gives is spot on and the list of fixes is so clear we now know exactly what to do next.”
Joe · gorillastudio.co.uk
“Ferguson's findings actually differ from what you get from a regular AI. I tried Claude against my website first and Ferguson was better. I'm a Java developer, not an SEO specialist, so the report was priceless for me. There are a lot of solo devs who are experts in their field but absolute beginners at conversion and SEO. Those people need something like Ferguson.”
Volodymyr · garlandframework.dev
Over 200 sites audited and counting
Permit me to demonstrate
You've read your own page so many times the words have lost meaning. Ferguson hasn't. He arrives cold, reads carefully, and tells you honestly what a visitor would make of it, and what they would do next.
The report you receive is specific to your page. Every observation is grounded in what is actually there. Not a generic checklist. Not recycled advice from another page entirely.
The action plan
A long list of problems with no indication of priority is not a plan. It is anxiety in document form. Ferguson tells you what matters most, what can wait, and writes the corrected copy so you are not left staring at a blank page.
The most valuable fixes come first
Issues are ranked so your effort goes where it will have the greatest impact on conversions.
Written evidence, not assumptions
Every problem identified is grounded in something specific on your page.
The rewrite, not just the note
Where it counts, Ferguson composes the corrected copy, ready to use or adapt.
The benchmark
A generic AI has no memory of the pages it has seen before, every review starts from zero. Ferguson works differently: every audit feeds a growing benchmark, so you instantly see what percentage of sites in your category share that same type of issue.
A history generic AI doesn't have
Ferguson keeps what it has already audited. A single AI prompt starts cold every time, with no memory of any other page.
Where to catch up
See which of your issues are common across your category, so you know what is costing you ground against competitors.
Where you already outshine
For each of the 12 core checks you can instantly see where you sit in relation to other sites in your category.
New categories start without one
If your page is among the first audited in its category, there may not be enough history yet for a comparison. It appears as soon as there is.
This comparison is something a generic AI prompt cannot replicate. It has no audit history to draw from, only a guess made fresh each time.
Who's reading your page
Most tools tell you what to fix. Ferguson tells you who is reading your page, what they fear, and crucially which of the right visitors are leaving because the page is giving them the wrong signal.
Who they are and why they're here
A specific picture of the visitor arriving cold: their context, their awareness level, and what would make them stay.
Who the page is unintentionally repelling
The right-fit prospect who leaves anyway, and the exact signal that sends them away.
The biggest unanswered question
The single doubt still in a cold visitor's mind after reading everything: the last thing standing between them and converting.
Track your progress
Every report places your page in one of four bands: Strong, Converting well, Room to improve, or Losing visitors. Make the changes recommended, re-audit, and watch the band move. That is the whole point.
Four bands, not a vague number
Strong, Converting well, Room to improve, Losing visitors. Four clear positions so you always know where you stand and what reaching the next level actually requires.
An honest summary
Three paragraphs. What is working, what isn't, and what Ferguson would do about it.
Audience and voice
Who is reading your page, what they fear, and whether your tone of voice is helping or hurting.
Assessment
https://flowsync.io
Goal: Free trial sign-up
Across 10 SaaS pages Ferguson has audited, the typical result is Converting well - this page falls below that.
Executive Summary
Flowsync's homepage communicates its niche positioning - project management built specifically for design teams - with genuine clarity. The headline passes the five-second test and the visual hierarchy is well-considered. There is real differentiation here worth preserving and building upon.
The page falters where trust is needed most. The trial CTA leads to a seven-field sign-up form; the only social proof is a single unattributed quote; and no pricing signal is visible for visitors ready to evaluate cost. Visitors who arrive motivated are given insufficient reason to commit.
Three changes would meaningfully lift conversions without redesign: reduce sign-up to email only, add a "no card required" assurance beside the primary CTA, and introduce two or three named customer testimonials. Each is a quick-win that requires copy changes only.
Ferguson's note: I gave Specific Claims and Trust a partial each rather than outright fails - "feedback rounds in half the time" is a genuine anchor that earns the half-point, and "no credit card required" does real work reducing trial friction. One more quantified claim and a single named testimonial would push both to a full pass.
What's working
Inferred audience
Who - Design leads and creative directors at mid-size agencies and in-house teams who are frustrated with generic PM tools that ignore how design review and feedback actually works.
Arriving as - Warm traffic from design community channels - Dribbble, Designer News, Twitter. They already believe the problem is real; they're evaluating whether Flowsync is the right solution.
Core fear - Another tool the team won't actually adopt. They've tried Asana and Notion and neither stuck - this feels like the same risk.
Alternative - Notion boards, Figma comments, or just shared Slack threads. Messy but free and already in use.
Who it's unintentionally repelling
Solo freelancers who don't have a team to collaborate with - the product's framing is entirely team-oriented and signals "not for you" immediately. Also likely repelling developers and PMs who happen to land here: the design-specific vocabulary reads as exclusionary rather than specialised.
Biggest unanswered question
“How is this actually different from using a Notion board or Figma comments for design reviews - what does Flowsync do that I can't already do with the tools my team already has?”
Each issue is benchmarked against real SaaSpages Ferguson has audited. That's context a generic LLM prompt has no way to give you.
Benchmark
Competitive opportunity
64% of SaaSpages we've audited have this type of issue.Fixing this puts you ahead of about half your competitors.Based on 142+ real audits, not a guess from a generic prompt
Benchmark
Common blind spot
81% of SaaSpages we've audited have this type of issue.Most competitors struggle here too, so fixing it brings you in line with best practices.Based on 142+ real audits, not a guess from a generic prompt
Benchmark
Rare issue
Only 16% of SaaSpages we've audited have this type of issue.Most sites get this right, so this is a quick fix to catch up to the majority.Based on 142+ real audits, not a guess from a generic prompt
Ahead of 18% of SaaS pages on this check
Behind 61% of SaaS pages on this check
"Ship projects faster" appears without numbers, but the "feedback rounds in half the time" claim gives a partial anchor.
On par with other SaaS pages, most don't pass this either
On par with other SaaS pages, they pass this too
A free trial is a medium-commitment ask; trust signals are thin, though "No credit card required" partially compensates.
~ Borderline - the note explains what was found and what would push it to a clear pass.
Give Ferguson two pages. He reads each independently as a cold visitor - no preconceptions, no brand loyalty - then delivers a side-by-side analysis grounded in what he actually observed.
Reads both pages fresh
Each domain is read independently before any comparison is drawn. No anchoring, no shortcuts.
Evidence before verdict
Each comparison dimension shows exactly what was observed on each page before a winner is called.
Improvements in your voice
Every suggestion is grounded in your own brand language - the goal is differentiation, not imitation.
Focus leads
yourdomain.com
4 of 6 dimensions
vs
competitor.com
2 dimensions leading
Anchor the headline to a specific outcome
competitor.com leads with a value claim tied to a concrete result. yourdomain.com describes the service without stating the transformation. Rewriting the hero around the specific outcome would close this gap.
Pricing
One-off packs or monthly plans. Cancel anytime.
1 Credit = 1 Single-page audit
Single payment
Audit Pack
Full refund before first use · Refund policy
Subscription
Pro
Cancel anytime · Refund policy
Agency
Cancel anytime · Refund policy
Questions